Color Farm Impact · The Dharma Project
The Suppression Weight · DeSoto
Sourced data
Confidential
Confidential
View through:
Dharma verdict
66–76. Undervalued, at the margin.
Recommendation: watch. A gap of +11 — residual sourced suppression, real but modest. Monitor the conditions that would widen or close it. (Gap +11)
What's holding the 60 down
Home-appraisal devaluation
+6.4
Mortgage-denial gap at equal income
+4.9
CC 60 + uplift +11LV 66–76
Current Conditions 60 + sourced suppression +11 = Latent Value 66–76. Click any factor to see the receipt.
Capital × Community Trust
Amber dot = DeSoto · dot size = latent gap (LV − CC) · click any dot to open its report.
Trust is a core axis of this thesis, not a footnote. High capital with low trust is exactly the pattern the Suppression Weight is built to surface — the Dharma Zone is where capital and trust move together.
LATENTlow capital · high trust
Trust is high but capital hasn’t arrived yet — the upside the thesis chases.
DHARMA ZONEhigh capital · high trust
Capital and community trust move together — the healthy target state.
SUPPRESSEDlow capital · low trust
Both capital and trust are held down — the starting condition suppression creates.
EXTRACTIVEhigh capital · low trust
Money is flowing in but the community doesn’t trust it — value is pulled out, not built.
v1 placeholder calibration (rho=0.80, ceiling=100). No headlineBand pinned (no external pitch value supplied); the engine derives the band from mean confidence. cc=60 is grounded in Census ACS data showing DeSoto's median household income above the Texas statewide median (approximately $67,000-$68,000, 2018-2022 5-year ACS) and near/above the US median (approximately $74,600, same vintage), alongside a homeownership rate well above both the Texas (~62%) and national (~65%) averages — an established, majority-Black (roughly two-thirds of residents) suburb with a long-tenured professional/middle-class base, not a suppression showcase. quadrant.capital/trust are a qualitative placement, refine with the content owner. Several candidate factors were researched and dropped under the kill rule as near-baseline or a weak fit for DeSoto's profile: CDC PLACES health outcomes (DeSoto's indicators sit close to the Dallas County baseline given dense healthcare access along the I-35E corridor), EPA EJScreen environmental burden (DeSoto is a residential/retail suburb with no pronounced pollution- or facility-siting-burden pattern comparable to Bankhead or Prince George's County), HOLC/redlining legacy (DeSoto was largely rural/undeveloped in the 1930s and was not HOLC-graded; its majority-Black population is a product of post-1980s suburbanization into an already-built or newly-built housing stock, not a 1930s redlining map that 'still predicts today'), and Census undercount (no material undercount residual beyond typical suburban-tract variance for an established, well-surveyed Dallas County municipality) — see docs/dharma-lens-v2/places/desoto-tx.md for the full kill-rule notes.